Protocols

VPN protocols differ sharply in their weaknesses: IPsec/IKE exposes aggressive-mode PSK disclosure, OpenVPN's security rests on configuration and key handling, PPTP's MS-CHAPv2 is cryptographically broken, WireGuard is sound but leaks through static-key management, and L2TP and SSTP inherit IPsec-PSK and TLS weaknesses respectively. The protocol in use dictates the attack.

1 min di letturaaggiornato il 7 ott 2026florianamette1 contributore
Chiedi al tuo assistente (MCP)Modifica su GitHub

VPNs run over different protocols, and each carries its own characteristic weaknesses, so identifying the protocol selects the attack. IPsec with IKE exposes aggressive-mode pre-shared-key hash disclosure and transform weaknesses. OpenVPN is cryptographically solid but its security depends entirely on configuration and key/certificate handling. PPTP is obsolete and its MS-CHAPv2 authentication is effectively broken. WireGuard's protocol is sound, so the attack shifts to its static-key management and identity exposure. And L2TP and SSTP inherit the weaknesses of what wraps them, an IPsec pre-shared key and TLS respectively.

Subtopics#

  • IPsec IKE: aggressive-mode PSK disclosure and IKE weaknesses.
  • OpenVPN: configuration, credential, and key-handling attacks.
  • PPTP: the broken MS-CHAPv2 authentication.
  • WireGuard: static-key management and identity exposure.
  • L2TP and SSTP: inherited IPsec-PSK and TLS weaknesses.

References#

PrecedenteProtocol detectionSuccessiva IPsec IKE